Well for one thing the thread itself ( not your original post or subsequent others) but some responses had a creep factor... big time! All someone had to do was put a link to the thread in a FB message and that would do it
I decide to erase because of some people's negative feedback about the post. I'm a little bit tired about comments like "now pervs are going to attack the girl for your post..." and that kind of bs. Mostly from SStuff btw who also criticize other recent posts I did with similar arguments. Anyway as I said before the pics I put in that other post were from an ad of some store, not personal pics from the lady, and u can found those with a google search. And they are 4 or 5 years old, so thousand of people has seen them. And pervs are everywhere in the internet, not only at the umd. Just that
Pinhead said: I decide to erase because of some people's negative feedback about the post. I'm a little bit tired about comments like "now pervs are going to attack the girl for your post..." and that kind of bs. Mostly from SStuff btw who also criticize other recent posts I did with similar arguments. Anyway as I said before the pics I put in that other post were from an ad of some store, not personal pics from the lady, and u can found those with a google search. And they are 4 or 5 years old, so thousand of people has seen them. And pervs are everywhere in the internet, not only at the umd. Just that
ANT has now commented on her facebook pictures from five years ago, and they only have a handful of comments, each of which she responded to, so she's very likely to see it. I obviously looked, so perhaps I'm hypocritical, but it the argument to not post facebook stuff on here certainly is compelling, at least from a practical perspective.
Pinhead said: I decide to erase because of some people's negative feedback about the post. I'm a little bit tired about comments like "now pervs are going to attack the girl for your post..." and that kind of bs. Mostly from SStuff btw who also criticize other recent posts I did with similar arguments. Anyway as I said before the pics I put in that other post were from an ad of some store, not personal pics from the lady, and u can found those with a google search. And they are 4 or 5 years old, so thousand of people has seen them. And pervs are everywhere in the internet, not only at the umd. Just that
ANT has now commented on her facebook pictures from five years ago, and they only have a handful of comments, each of which she responded to, so she's very likely to see it. I obviously looked, so perhaps I'm hypocritical, but it the argument to not post facebook stuff on here certainly is compelling, at least from a practical perspective.
And that was my only point, Pinhead. As soon as you linked back to her personal Instagram, someone else found her personal Facebook page.... and now AntDX (AKA Guy Who Posts Sexual Comments on YouTube Vids from 12-Year-Olds) is posting his usual shit on her page.
It was a great find, and the Facebook stuff (which was someone else) even better, but as long as we have that 3% that can't control themselves on social media, this will keep happening. Best to post pics with no way to personally connect them back, and if someone wants the link privately do it that way.
I gotta agree with Sstuff on this one. It's a great find Pinhead, but I've seen it happen so many times on this forum. Someone post a pic or vid from someone's personal social media (facebook, youtube, etc.) Next thing you know a bunch of pervs are harassing them in the comments.
There's even been a guy on here who basically admitted to bordeline stalking a woman in a post awhile back after seeing them take a pie at their job in a youtube clip. Thats why now if I post any clips its from a movie or tv show instead of someone's personal channel. You got too many crazy people out there like AntDX, RunninRebel, Youtubesuckspoo, etc.
Pinhead said: OK guys, you got a point, I wasn't aware of some things. I tend to believe that a guy like ANT cannot see posts here after being banned.
Everyone forgets to make their post "private," but that's an option. If you do, you can ONLY see the post after signing in with your UMD account.
That said, I have no idea if ANT simply created a new account here once the first one was banned. I would hope that MM blocks IPs to prevent that, but honestly not sure.
SStuff said: That said, I have no idea if ANT simply created a new account here once the first one was banned. I would hope that MM blocks IPs to prevent that, but honestly not sure.
No way he would be able to keep his mouth shut, right?
Pinhead said: I decide to erase because of some people's negative feedback about the post. I'm a little bit tired about comments like "now pervs are going to attack the girl for your post..." and that kind of bs. Mostly from SStuff btw who also criticize other recent posts I did with similar arguments. Anyway as I said before the pics I put in that other post were from an ad of some store, not personal pics from the lady, and u can found those with a google search. And they are 4 or 5 years old, so thousand of people has seen them. And pervs are everywhere in the internet, not only at the umd. Just that
ANT has now commented on her facebook pictures from five years ago, and they only have a handful of comments, each of which she responded to, so she's very likely to see it. I obviously looked, so perhaps I'm hypocritical, but it the argument to not post facebook stuff on here certainly is compelling, at least from a practical perspective.
And that was my only point, Pinhead. As soon as you linked back to her personal Instagram, someone else found her personal Facebook page.... and now AntDX (AKA Guy Who Posts Sexual Comments on YouTube Vids from 12-Year-Olds) is posting his usual shit on her page.
It was a great find, and the Facebook stuff (which was someone else) even better, but as long as we have that 3% that can't control themselves on social media, this will keep happening. Best to post pics with no way to personally connect them back, and if someone wants the link privately do it that way.
I would ask if he could just be IP banned, but I guess VPNs let him get around that huh?
SStuff said: Everyone forgets to make their post "private," but that's an option. If you do, you can ONLY see the post after signing in with your UMD account.
I agree with Rich here. Not only that, I feel like that should be the default for all posts. Yes, it's easily circumvented by creating an account which you need zero personal information to do...but it's at least one more shield.
Like here's something to consider. Look at the models for example. They have real names, addresses, phone numbers, family etc. This is exactly the reason that kind of information is NOT common knowledge.
So imagine, the amount of trust they have to have to allow someone into their life from the fetish. There was a post awhile back where someone posted that a WAM model moved in next door. I EMPLORED them to not share the information. They posted a twitter post that was mostly blacked out, but it wasn't hard for even me to trace it. It was too late, before I could contact them someone already posted who it was.
Pinhead clearly didn't mean anything negative in his post, but alas, it was a tool. You can use a screwdriver to secure something, OR you could use it to shank someone.
I'm not immune to this either. I unintentionally betrayed someone's trust here in the past. I didn't mean it, but the damage was done.
This also goes back to a thread on here late last year about Female Harassment in the community. I think we are past the point where you can safely post Civilian Finds anymore, and this was a clear example as to why. Bare minimum they should be made a Private Post to hide them for general searches and randoms, as you should fully expect the content will be descended upon by the undesirables of the community. In the past 24 hours, this girl has received producer emails and Facebook comments about some very niche photoshoots she did several years ago.
I'm also baffled by how someone as brazen as ANT can get away with such creepy and disgusting behaviour in front of 450 Facebook friends. I mean the dude has his Linkedin profile up there as well, with the same photo and name as the YouTube account where he posts sexualised comments about young girls pieing themselves. Would 100% be sending those comments to his employer if he had one. He's clearly not all there.
I have a few great finds (Including a much sought-after one from last year) but I won't post them as the people in the video are so easily contactable by social media.