Enigmahood said: I hope nobody attempts to approach her about this. You *WILL* creep her out, please do not.
Ten separate people on this forum already took that as a challenge, and are currently flooding her InBox with every request ranging from messy blowjobs to messy white socks.
Hopefully she has a thick skin, because this forum thinks with only one body part.
Enigmahood said: I hope nobody attempts to approach her about this. You *WILL* creep her out, please do not.
Ten separate people on this forum already took that as a challenge, and are currently flooding her InBox with every request ranging from messy blowjobs to messy white socks.
Hopefully she has a thick skin, because this forum thinks with only one body part.
Are you speaking hypothetically or are you following her and several cretins actually did pull a RunningRebel on her and flood her with strange fetish requests?
SStuff said: Hypothetically, but the odds of this NOT happening are infinitely smaller than the chances that it will. And probably, already has.
Because literally the ONLY way to stop the trolls from ruining it for everyone... Is to simply make sure they are unaware of the ways to ruin it. :-S
Difficult in this case, as I was hoping someone might have seen the entire video, assuming it has shown up anywhere. With luck, her being a quasi-celebrity will make it just difficult enough to contact (ie. harass) her that the UMD Running Rebel types won't get her directly, and creep her out.
I should have probably just posted this at Tellygunge and not here in retrospect. Just as many solid WAM hunters as you'll find here without the plethora of psychopaths.
Yes, the gal is beautiful (even through the mess)....I note that before the pie, she is already quite messed up (splosh style, as it were)...I find it nearly impossible to believe that she is not/was not aware of the erotic nature of what she was doing....still, that is no excuse or invitation for trolls....trolls do what they do primarily because the Internet allows them to be anonymous (it's convenient, for commenting and social "liking" if commentors are not required to register first and provide proof of ID -- that would slow down the whole popularity and traffic-getting game)
wamajama said: Yes, the gal is beautiful (even through the mess)....I note that before the pie, she is already quite messed up (splosh style, as it were)...I find it nearly impossible to believe that she is not/was not aware of the erotic nature of what she was doing....still, that is no excuse or invitation for trolls....trolls do what they do primarily because the Internet allows them to be anonymous (it's convenient, for commenting and social "liking" if commentors are not required to register first and provide proof of ID -- that would slow down the whole popularity and traffic-getting game)
She's pretty aware of the erotic nature of everything she does, even if she herself doesn't necessarily find it erotic. And she must have a thick skin, given quantity of the nasty comments her sexy pics, and some of her vines, get. She's a big fan of comedy and slapstick, and taking a pie in the face (or several, in this case) is fun and funny - enjoyable in that context, and not as a fetish. (Of course I don't know that for certain, but there's no evidence here. Best not to assume she's one of us unless she comes out like Sarah Shahi).
So, she did remove the vine from her account (though it's still available elsewhere). Someone here doing the usual vile trolling? Probably, yeah. Maybe her media company just asked her to take down the vine until the video itself goes live. Or not. If the video never goes live... well, you know.
This is exactly why I didn't post the vine on this forum, when I discovered it a few days ago. Too many lurking obsessive creeps, with no social skills. They always feel the need to try and contact someone. All they do is ruin things for the community.
wamajama said: Yes, the gal is beautiful (even through the mess)....I note that before the pie, she is already quite messed up (splosh style, as it were)...I find it nearly impossible to believe that she is not/was not aware of the erotic nature of what she was doing....still, that is no excuse or invitation for trolls....trolls do what they do primarily because the Internet allows them to be anonymous (it's convenient, for commenting and social "liking" if commentors are not required to register first and provide proof of ID -- that would slow down the whole popularity and traffic-getting game)
She's pretty aware of the erotic nature of everything she does, even if she herself doesn't necessarily find it erotic. And she must have a thick skin, given quantity of the nasty comments her sexy pics, and some of her vines, get. She's a big fan of comedy and slapstick, and taking a pie in the face (or several, in this case) is fun and funny - enjoyable in that context, and not as a fetish. (Of course I don't know that for certain, but there's no evidence here. Best not to assume she's one of us unless she comes out like Sarah Shahi).
So, she did remove the vine from her account (though it's still available elsewhere). Someone here doing the usual vile trolling? Probably, yeah. Maybe her media company just asked her to take down the vine until the video itself goes live. Or not. If the video never goes live... well, you know.
I think some of us need to step away from this for a second. Too often there is this idea that if some woman engages in slapstick comedy then that automatically means "they're a wammer" or are "aware of the erotic nature" of what they're doing.
Can't sometimes a pie in the face just be a pie in the face? And by sometimes, I mean pretty much all the time outside of the handful of producers doing it for our benefit?
What is possibly erotic to a non-wammer about seeing a beautiful girl get smashed in the face with a pie? Her being in a bikini and having ice/water dumped on her? I can see why you might get the rude comment about a boner on those, but anyone who isn't into our kink will not get turned on even remotely by any number of pies smashes in her face -- and in fact, you can probably make a graph where the relationship to her being pied being of interest to us also being directly opposite of what John Q. Public would find erotic.
Let's just assume, unless someone directly says otherwise, that they find nothing about a pie in the face erotic whatsoever, I say.
The vine doesn't appear on any of her personal accounts on facebook,twitter,youtube, etc. Her hashtag is mentioned in one of the vines but nothing else.
Enigmahood said: I think some of us need to step away from this for a second. Too often there is this idea that if some woman engages in slapstick comedy then that automatically means "they're a wammer" or are "aware of the erotic nature" of what they're doing.
Can't sometimes a pie in the face just be a pie in the face? And by sometimes, I mean pretty much all the time outside of the handful of producers doing it for our benefit?
What is possibly erotic to a non-wammer about seeing a beautiful girl get smashed in the face with a pie? Her being in a bikini and having ice/water dumped on her? I can see why you might get the rude comment about a boner on those, but anyone who isn't into our kink will not get turned on even remotely by any number of pies smashes in her face -- and in fact, you can probably make a graph where the relationship to her being pied being of interest to us also being directly opposite of what John Q. Public would find erotic.
Let's just assume, unless someone directly says otherwise, that they find nothing about a pie in the face erotic whatsoever, I say.
She's a Playboy Playmate. She knows exactly what she's doing.
Guys its gone. If you look at the playlist for the site she says its coming to soon, there is a deleted video right where it probably would have been. Oh well the vine is still pretty awesome.
SStuff said: Hypothetically, but the odds of this NOT happening are infinitely smaller than the chances that it will. And probably, already has.
Because literally the ONLY way to stop the trolls from ruining it for everyone... Is to simply make sure they are unaware of the ways to ruin it. :-S
What I think Rich is trying to say is... if you're going to creep a woman out, make sexually-charged comments on her YouTube channel that are so outrageous & over-the-top that at least the rest of can get a really good laugh out of them.
Like at least one YouTuber of yore, whose YT name I totally forget.
That's... that's what you were trying to say, Rich. Right?
Enigmahood said: I think some of us need to step away from this for a second. Too often there is this idea that if some woman engages in slapstick comedy then that automatically means "they're a wammer" or are "aware of the erotic nature" of what they're doing.
Can't sometimes a pie in the face just be a pie in the face? And by sometimes, I mean pretty much all the time outside of the handful of producers doing it for our benefit?
What is possibly erotic to a non-wammer about seeing a beautiful girl get smashed in the face with a pie? Her being in a bikini and having ice/water dumped on her? I can see why you might get the rude comment about a boner on those, but anyone who isn't into our kink will not get turned on even remotely by any number of pies smashes in her face -- and in fact, you can probably make a graph where the relationship to her being pied being of interest to us also being directly opposite of what John Q. Public would find erotic.
Let's just assume, unless someone directly says otherwise, that they find nothing about a pie in the face erotic whatsoever, I say.
She's a Playboy Playmate. She knows exactly what she's doing.
I might agree that she know what she's doing in this case, but I'd like to submit that the, "Oh, look, she does this, she's a wammer," is the same logic that enables ugly, socially inept guys, to assume the most attractive women around them at any time "totally wants" them, and when she shoots them down hardcore, these guys still assume she's playing hard to get.
Eventually, you get stupid MRA going and shooting attractive women because they think the women "owed" them sex or the time of day. That somehow, they just "deserved" it. I really have no clue what makes these guys tick, but as the guy who girls call to protect them from these guys, I've seen it over and over, and I suspect the same flawed logic goes into "Oh look, she did that once, she's a wammer." It's wishful thinking and a denial of reality that leads them to act this way, perhaps, and us telling them, "don't go make creepy posts" will have about as much affect on them as the "No means no" campaigns did.
I understand what you are saying, but I think you misinterpreted what I was saying....being "aware of the erotic nature" of what she does, in my mind, does NOT mean she is a wammer (nor did I state or imply this, intentionally)....that said, I'm sure some here or elsewhere would make that leap (and troll)....to be more clear: as an example, most of the models here know that many here (if not most) find this type of "slapstick" erotic (or both funny and sexy, like myself), while they may find it fun, exciting, sensual, etc.....some might even develop an erotic taste for it, etc...I never assume that it's a turn-on for any female (that goes for most, not all, of the female "wammers" here)...I assume that it's a fun/playful way to make money (while playing to an audience that finds it more than just funny).
That video is now up - basically they chuck a load of trifle ingredients at her, via a 235mph leaf blower. It's pretty cool, and in HD. On the trailer for Amanda Cerny week there's a hint of something else too - she looks as if she's reading the weather in a mac, which could be interesting.