Our likes and dislikes regarding WAM, Sploshing, Mudding etc., are all personal choices and respect to everyone and their own personal choice. However I think there's one thing each of us has a strong personal opinion on and that's Coverage.

That said, I wondered how important coverage is to you?

Personally, unless a session finishes with total coverage, especially head and face then it does very little for me, and the thicker, messier and more unrecognisable the "victim" is the better, as long as we have a half decent 'before" shot

How about you folks, is it Total or Partial coverage for you?

Nothing wrong with either, but I feel that if the person is going to get messy, that person may as well go ALL OUT.

It should be like insurance -- 100% coverage.

Very partial to full coverage, but my preference is for more like a transformation into a statue, like in Rob Blaine's old blackbird clay videos, or paint sets in which the model is coated head to toe with no skin showing. If the woman is buried under mounds of stuff, it's still cool (like emerging from a marshmallow or Kaolin submersion or something similar) but I think it loses something when you can't see the female form.

That sounds really oddly specific, but hey, this kink has a spectrum, amirite?

We're very much into full coverage but don't mind the impedance of vision. Full-on sex is also included in our sessions because, fuck it, we've already gone this far, and when vision is removed, it becomes much more sensual. At that point, you're paying much more attention to the feel if it from points all over your body, and every little movement -particular the sexual ones- become so much more intense.

Head and face coverage is something that's always puzzled me. I know fans love it so our people always do it in the dungeon and usually do it in the mud, and they do enjoy doing it to each other as the grand finalle of a scene, but we do that specifically for the viewers. If I was shooting just for myself, it'd be total coverage from the neck down, and head/hair/face coverage would be enrtitely optional.

It's like the pie in the face thing. I get that it's hilariously funny to splatter a pie-full of custard into someone's face, especially if they act like they're not expecting it / shocked by it, and we've done a good few scenes where the girls do that to each other, and we all fell about laughing when the cameras stopped. And as long as the pies / flans are sloppy enough, it can be a good way to start to mess someone's clothes up. But to me a pie in the face is just funny, I don't find it sexy in the way that pouring stuff into a girl's cleavage, or having her sit on a sloppy cake, is sexy.

There's also that once you cover someone's face you can't see their expression any more. So, other than delibarete pie scenes, if someone is going to get their head messy, I prefer it to be at the end of a scene, not the start. I really don't get why so many WAM scenes start with mess poured over a girls's head first. Cover the rest of her first, head and face should be saved till the end.

I love both. I've tried to experiment with partial coverage but it is very hard to resist covering the entire body if I have enough available substance.

Sometimes I will shoot a short scene however, as it is basically me filming in case I feel like releasing just the photoset, and not an entire video. In these cases most often than not, I don't have a large quantity for full coverage.

It also greatly depends on the substance. For me, I don't need full coverage if I'm being hit with pies. Just the face or butt is fine with me. Especially if I'm clothed. There's something very exotic about messing up a beautiful pair of bluejeans by sitting on a pie or cake, and letting people see it.

The reason I enjoy paint so much is because while it offers a lot of coverage, it doesn't totally obscure my features. You can still make out a smile, breasts, a tongue, etc. The same can be said about a thin slime or batter. You still get to enjoy what's underneath.

All that being said, full extreme coverage like being totally submerged in thick clay and coming up looking unrecognizable, at least for me, is just as hot as a girl soaked in a thinner consistency. They both have such unique versions of the same substance, and it's versatility is quite appealing. I want to try both one day. The thought of being up to my waist in clay or mud and coming out showing the mess on my lower half is very erotic to me. The thought of someone pushing me face first into a bottomless pit is just as arousing.

I could not agree more!

Only addition would be I do like to see eyes for added emotion if at least cleared between messy applications.

For me, I definitely prefer a slower, deliberate progress. For am outdoor mud scene, for example, start at the bottom and work your way up, essentially.

My favorite is to combine that with water... get wet little by little, followed - closely or not - by getting muddy.

It feels more sensual to me that way, kinda foreplay.

Not that throwing me in a pool or swamp or whatever wouldn't be a blast, but... the buildup in intensity and dynamics is what I prefer to experience... and watch!

I buy probably 80% pie videos and if a scene doesn't have full coverage it's an instant delete.

As much as partial coverage annoys me, nothing frustrates me though like the instant wiping model. Especially the insta-look-down-and-both-hands-squeegee-wiping model. LOL

Desires are so different.
For me there are two kicks and one turn-off. The kicks are stuff running down inside the blouse or shirt, and sitting on a cream-cake.
The turn-off ist the complete covering.

For me, the attraction is two fold.

1) My face has to be covered and unrecognisable
2) Not always, but sometimes I like the vinegary smell when my head is gunged

Totally with you on this. My face gets it, or it doesn't happen!

I just need a pretty face covered by pies and/or slime. Full coverage and full nudity is nothing I would ever complain about, of course, but the face stuff is non-negotiable.

Absolutely agree. Nudity does nothing for me. Dressing up in character adds to the slapstick theme, but my face had to get it, or it doesn't happen!

Total coverage all day, every day, but with a few caveats;

1. If it's wetlook or mud, I prefer gradually rather than someone just jumping in a pool.

2. Full body painting and burying do nothing for me.

3. I've also discovered recently that I think I prefer vastly prefer manually gunging someone (eg multiple buckets) rather than a tank that does it all at once.

4. And then full coverage does nothing for me if the model is stripped or her outfit is destroyed.

Some fantastic responses here Guys and Girls

Couldn't agree with this more. Some of the total obliteration scenes take away the body parts and facial expressions which for me are a big part of the scene. That's why RubberCartoon's scenes are some of the best out there!

"Personally, unless a session finishes with total coverage, especially head and face then it does very little for me, and the thicker, messier and more unrecognisable the "victim" is the better.."

I agree 1,000 percent!