What do you think is the percentage of naked vs clothed?

I literally did this poll with a 3rd option like 2 weeks ago. lol

https://umd.net/forums/do-you-prefer-the-models-clothed-nude-pr

I mean if you are asking about WAM as a fetish, then why not naked?

I mean, everything's better naked, so...

To those of us who prefer fully clothed WAM, nude is of no interest. There are basically three main approaches to WAM:

1. Fully clothed throughout.
2. Start clothed, get messy, get naked, get messier.
3. Naked all the way through.

There isn't a right or wrong way, all three approaches are equally valid. But different people will like different ones. In my case, WAM is very much a fetish for me, but I want to see fully clothed girls getting messy, I have zero reaction to nudity. But a hot girl in sportswear having her pants filled with pink goo? Oh hell yeah!

Progressively getting nude

Always clothes! I never do naked I love to wear clothes it's most exciting part of wam! Muddy in clothes is so great and looks way too cute! I really enjoy to wam in my school uniform!

Wet look clothes so nice! Naked wetlook is just bath!

I don't know why but I prefer clothed, both watching and getting messy myself.

Naked to answer your question.

But tbh I do like both clothes and naked. If I watch a messy scene, I would prefer to like to watch some sexy girl or girls, depending how many there are at the time, to be wearing clothes to begin with and then a gradual getting towards naked, then continue with the messy scene.

Just in a wam context - I just prefer to not combine nudity with wam and leave that part to the imagination. I feel like I get distracted by the nudity and it takes a little away from the mess. Hope that makes a small bit of sense lol.

In my case nothing at all, to me naked people, no matter how attractive, are just "meh", while I can appreciate the asthetics of an artistic nude image, it has no more sexual meaning to me than a classical landscape or a cool photo of one of those abandoned diners on Route 66. If I could swim I'd probably be the perfect lifeguard for a nudist beach, zero distractions.

But add the right clothes, and the level of sexual attraction startes to take off, add WAM as well and it becomes stratospheric. I've come to realise I have a very strong clothing fetish, as well as a WAM one. One of the things I enjoy about being a WAM producer is buying outfits for the models to wear, thinking who'll look good in a particular combination, both clean, and once they start to get messy.

Wam isn't sexual for me! I'm actually asexual so nothing is attractive to me sexually.

Gunge- prefer clothed
Mud- prefer nude

Although a nude model who's using the gunge to hide her naughty bits? wowee thats some hot stuff right there!

I voted in your slightly more comprehensive poll.

It's not a dichotomy. It's complicated. When someone is messy they are arguably no longer nude.

I prefer comprehensive messiness - from as messy as possible fully clothed to as messy as possible partially clothed and as messy as possible nude. All these states serve to both subsume and accentuate the female form at different points. It's a tease.

Indeed, and it was great. It's hard to break into just one of two camps. I'm definitely a progressive type.

Just like with vanilla sex, you start of clothed and start tearing each other's clothes off as you go, so WAM is basically the same for me. The right outfit can really set the mood, but eventually you get to a point where they're in the way.

Clothes really don't do anything for me, I don't really care either way so long as the model is getting her hair completely covered in mess, preferably without looking up and doing a facial...and preferably without pies

You might like some of our scenes. We cover and fill our people's clothes first, I've always believed in gunging people from the legs up rather than head down, but towards the end of our scenes the girls always complete their messing by totally covering each other's hair in mess, usually by pouring it on, and then often shampooing it in so it covers every strand, especially with custard scenes.

The format of most of our scenes is we mess the girls' bottom halves first, then upper body and arms, and then their hair and faces getting covered is the grand finale.

Are you asking for our preferences or what we think the most WAM materials are?

Clothed has a rather large sub category that naked doesn't have. That's the psychological aspect which is in many cases the deciding factor in the purchase of a WAM video along with whether or not one enjoys "engaged" WAMing with a friend.

Without that psychological "kick", people don't purchase OR engage.

Nude WAM is purely visceral in most cases. It's the "gut"...the pleasurable physical reaction to nudity. But it's difficult (not impossible) to do a storyline with nudity. And the storyline which grabs the psychological aspect of why many like WAM is much easier to do clothed.

I have said for years the comparison should never be clothed vs. nude, but rather "visual vs. psychological."

Just my opinion....I like to see a girl clothed, then gradually stripped to nude and messed up in the meantime...this is what I found most attractive for me. Thanks

The Exact wording of his sentence would be would guess the most used.

I would add several more to your list. What about bikini wam? Lingerie? I wouldn't call those 'fully clothed'. Some would even start naked, get messy, get dressed, get messier. I particularly enjoy clingy, see-through dresses that go instantly transparent when wet, so it makes sense to use clear slime or honey or similar to make them appear transparent. But to each their own.

In this context they count, though perhaps that should be just "clothed" instead of "fully clothed".

Something I've come to realise, I used to count skimpy bikini wam as effectively nude, there's so little clothing there that to me it's equally of almost zero interest. But eventually I realised I was wrong, to someone who wants actual "can see their genitals" nudity, a bikini might as well be a boilersuit, it's blocking the view of their version of the money shots. So in this context of broad wam types, it counts as clothed, assuming it's kept on throughout.


That's a fair point. So in fact there are four main versions:

1. Clothed throughout.
2. Start clothed, get messy, get naked, get messier.
3. Start naked, get messy, get clothed, get messier.
4. Naked all the way through.


Fair enough, in the 4 items that counts as 1, clothed, if they start out with the dresses on and keep them on throughout. Even if they go see-through, from a broad classification point of view it's still a form of clothed wam.