Good reply. You've got every right to imagine what you like. Hell, who doesn't have fantasies? I'm not against that at all
What I'm worried about is if AI can create fake content for next to no cost, by processing real content that took money and effort to produce, what's going to happen to the real content in the long run? It won't be financially viable, so the imitator will kill off the original and all you'll end up with is fake... and fake is empty and joyless as you can't be amazed at how filthy they are when you know it's not real.
That's more than enough preaching from me. I'm off to proposition a sex android that will do anything you want apart from being real!
Muddddy said: Good reply. You've got every right to imagine what you like. Hell, who doesn't have fantasies? I'm not against that at all
What I'm worried about is if AI can create fake content for next to no cost, by processing real content that took money and effort to produce, what's going to happen to the real content in the long run? It won't be financially viable, so the imitator will kill off the original and all you'll end up with is fake... and fake is empty and joyless as you can't be amazed at how filthy they are when you know it's not real.
That's more than enough preaching from me. I'm off to proposition a sex android that will do anything you want apart from being real!
I think you've explained why AI imagery shouldn't take away anything from real content producers - because people know that whatever WAM effect is in an AI image, it wasn't actually experienced by a real person and, at the end of the day, there's no substitute for real-life WAM experiences.
I think the best way to consider AI images is as artworks. Most people have a mixture of paintings, prints and real-life photos on the walls of their homes and I would say it's really just the same thing if you have both real-life and AI WAM images on your computer should you wish to. AI imagery is just a different artform.
I find so many of these absolutely stunning and incredibly sexy. And with a couple of them in particular my brain doesn't know it's AI. When I first saw a few I honestly didn't know they weren't real. Many of them you can "tell" but I don't care and I imagine as it gets better they'll get more and more realistic. But seriously, bravo and thank you. And one of the brunettes, goddamn I find so attractive and I'm like crushing on a phantom or something lol. I like this new weird brain space, being attracted to a woman that doesn't exist. I agree that part of the thrill of wam is finding someone who likes it, is turned on by it, and the prospect of doing it with them. But a couple of these are so good to me that I dont' care and my brain doesn't know the difference. Thanks again, what a great use of AI!
Homer said: I find so many of these absolutely stunning and incredibly sexy. And with a couple of them in particular my brain doesn't know it's AI. When I first saw a few I honestly didn't know they weren't real. Many of them you can "tell" but I don't care and I imagine as it gets better they'll get more and more realistic. But seriously, bravo and thank you. And one of the brunettes, goddamn I find so attractive and I'm like crushing on a phantom or something lol. I like this new weird brain space, being attracted to a woman that doesn't exist. I agree that part of the thrill of wam is finding someone who likes it, is turned on by it, and the prospect of doing it with them. But a couple of these are so good to me that I dont' care and my brain doesn't know the difference. Thanks again, what a great use of AI!
Thank you
Yeah hehe it is a bit sad that they are not real. It will randomly generate a beautiful character which cannot be reproduced. It is like seeing a beautiful woman and realizing that you will never see her again. It is also like a "find" where you can't find more.
It is even a bit sad that the scenario didn't exist. There are so many experiences that I want to have but I can't. It is like watching any scene and having a desire to experience what the model is experiencing.
I enjoy reading comments to hear about what people have to say including positive, negative, and concerned comments. Seeing the reactions the the social aspect of posting these is what makes this fun.
mFeelzGood said: A few more results which did not turn out well.
The female astronaut seemed a bit too young and fake.
I don't know if I should generate controversial things like a woman being arrested for being muddy and naked in public. I couldn't get the mud on her to look natural. Changes I make to the prompt might unintentionally make the police officer naked or muddy when I want the uniform.
I could not create a decent yoga scene or yoga poses.
The woman sitting with a brick wall is supposed to be in jail and hand cuffed. I could not generate hand cuffs.
The woman sitting on the desk had an amazing pose, but I could not change the mud type without ruining it.
Glasses were difficult. This was as good as I could get.
This is my biggest pet peeve with generating AI currently. It's sometimes impossible to get the exact result that I'd like, no matter what tweaks are made. Hopefully it gets easier to be more precise in the near future.
I was generating images of crowds of women at burningman in mud. I got some pretty interesting results. Then I saw replies on: https://umd.net/forums/burning-man
I read how horrible it was.
It reminds me how different I am for wanting to be muddy when there are thousands of people at that festival who want nothing less than to be there in the mud.
There are all sorts of parody images or fantasy images I could create of burningman. It does not seem right. I will just share one image which I did not spend much time on. It is just an image of a sad woman in mud.
I am experimenting with videos and gifs using AnimateDiff for stable diffusion. This is not vid2vid. Here is one result. I did not upscale it. I am able to change facial expressions.
TheSlimerDA said: Nice work! Been tempted to try animation, maybe one day I give it another try. How hard was that to setup?
Thanks! The setup on A1111 is not bad. It just requires an extension and and a model to download. I still use SD 1.5. It takes me like 10 minutes on my 2017 hardware to generate this one 24 frame 512x512 gif.
TheSlimerDA said: Is it just AnimateDiff? Does it work via prompt or you have to feed it video or something? 10 minutes for 24 frames?! That is rough!
Yep I just have AnimateDiff and ControlNet extensions. I think it is possible to setup with comfyUI and SDXL but I have not tried.
It does not require a video. That was my main reservation of trying videos. I did not want to take someone's video and turn it into wam content. The entire gif was created from just the prompt. My prompt used prompt-traversal and looked like this:
woman, sunny, naturally beautiful face, soft smile, brunette, submerged in clay mud, (earthen clay mud:1.3) <lora:mud:1> 0: soft smile, eyes looking at the camera 10: laughing smile 18: soft smile, eyes closed</lora:mud:1>
TheSlimerDA said: I'm with you there. That was my main hesitation, and I got too much on my plate as it is. Ok that's cool though. And it works with your LoRA that's another bonus. Final, thought the controlnet was to keep the image in place? Like openpose, or were using canny or something for the overall image details?
I haven't tried using controlnet with this yet. I have it disabled. I have a fresh install of automatic1111 for this. I just followed a guide which said to install controlnet. AnimateDiff works with a model that is trained on video that keeps the subject in place. Without the Prompt Travel, it still animates the subject in place have having her blink and make subtle movements.
I haven't tried upscaling yet. Also for some reason the result of the gif is much worse than the result that I get from the individual image. It becomes blurry and the colors are less vibrant.
This might give you very interesting results with slime. I tried and it does make slime flow down the subjects face. I don't have a lora on slime, so the result isn't that good. It is a bit unrealistic because the slime just suddenly appears on the face hehe.