ben12 said: there was an update last month, the tormenting of fi or something like that where fi gets gunged by cate i think. jw where it is

user1234 said: Being that I posted the post that you refer to...I can say that I dig this as opposed to the pan aways and stuff!

Georgerv said: I Left my comment on the youtube vid

BTW is this going to go up on the members area?

stickinthemud said: Well, as a head and hair wam fan, I like the shots from the chest up. I don't mind full body pans, my only problem with them (and this is in general with most videos, not singling out yours) is that when a pan happens it seems like I'm looking at the feet when I really want to see the top. For example: I will watch a model sitting in a chair not moving and getting gunged for a while, then the camera pans down and just as soon as the camera gets to about waist level you can see that the model bends over but all I'm seeing is her knees at this point. Like I said earlier, I really like hair coverage, so I like seeing the way the hair moves or falls when the model bends over, but I miss it. Or if the model is standing and there is a pan down, the model will spin around about halfway through the pan and be back facing the camera halfway back up the pan. Then I cant see the back of her head. This is just my perspective as a hair fan. This is what I like to see and the problems I usually face when watching a video. If server space wasn't an Issue I would suggest putting up a video with the pan and a video with just the head shot. However, I know server space costs a lot of money and this is more than likely impractical.

bosunbob said: Personally I find the longshot is too zoomed out to see what is going on and the closeup is too tight in to see the gunge after it drips off Tammie's face. I'd prefer a shot somewhere inbetween the two but then again I like the normal camera work you do with the panning shot so if you ask me don't change stuff.

stickinthemud said: Well, as a head and hair wam fan, I like the shots from the chest up. I don't mind full body pans, my only problem with them (and this is in general with most videos, not singling out yours) is that when a pan happens it seems like I'm looking at the feet when I really want to see the top. For example: I will watch a model sitting in a chair not moving and getting gunged for a while, then the camera pans down and just as soon as the camera gets to about waist level you can see that the model bends over but all I'm seeing is her knees at this point. Like I said earlier, I really like hair coverage, so I like seeing the way the hair moves or falls when the model bends over, but I miss it. Or if the model is standing and there is a pan down, the model will spin around about halfway through the pan and be back facing the camera halfway back up the pan. Then I cant see the back of her head. This is just my perspective as a hair fan. This is what I like to see and the problems I usually face when watching a video. If server space wasn't an Issue I would suggest putting up a video with the pan and a video with just the head shot. However, I know server space costs a lot of money and this is more than likely impractical.

noise said:

In the last members video we made a point of having Cate turn her head side to side to show her hair. Something we should maybe do more often for more contrived shoots.