Long time reader, first time poster.
Over the years, I have read a lot of posts wondering whether a woman is a wammer or not. The reason for my post is to say...you never know. My wife is a minor celebrity in our mid-sized Canadian city. She is a reporter for the local news (and occasional anchor) and guess what ...she is a wammer. Well I am the wammer in the relationship but she indulges me. In the 10 years we have been together, I have probably pied her 100 times. About once a year, she lets me pour 3-5 buckets of cake batter and a couple of bottles chocolate syrup over her in clothes she has decided she no longer wants to wear. I also enjoy the wetlook and she will swim fully clothed in the pool in the summer and take clothed showers in the winter. A couple of times she has come home from work and l have hit her with 20 pies in the suit she wore that day on tv. She has also volunteered to do a story on the circus knowing part of it involved her getting hit with a pie from a clown because she knew it would turn me on. All this to say...who knows if she is a wammer or not.
Over the years, I have read a lot of posts wondering whether a woman is a wammer or not. The reason for my post is to say...you never know. My wife is a minor celebrity in our mid-sized Canadian city. She is a reporter for the local news (and occasional anchor) and guess what ...she is a wammer. Well I am the wammer in the relationship but she indulges me. In the 10 years we have been together, I have probably pied her 100 times. About once a year, she lets me pour 3-5 buckets of cake batter and a couple of bottles chocolate syrup over her in clothes she has decided she no longer wants to wear. I also enjoy the wetlook and she will swim fully clothed in the pool in the summer and take clothed showers in the winter. A couple of times she has come home from work and l have hit her with 20 pies in the suit she wore that day on tv. She has also volunteered to do a story on the circus knowing part of it involved her getting hit with a pie from a clown because she knew it would turn me on. All this to say...who knows if she is a wammer or not.
(Guys, I really do not know how to reply to this one. Someone PM me an idea or two. There are just too many choices)
I really like this jacket but the sleeves are much too long......
Chances are somebody will figure out who she is and you'll regret posting this.
Or it's just a story in life's clothing.
Or it's just a story in life's clothing.
oink oink oink
I think you're a lucky guy to have such a lady.
What is a WAMmer?
Personally, I draw a distinction between having an innate WAM fetish and learning to WAM by virtue of having a life partner who WAMs.
In the first case, one has a mysterious attraction to WAMming activity dating from early childhood, which is often baffling to oneself, causing random disturbing guilty thoughts along the lines of "I just get VERY turned on by this...it makes me HOT so WHAT is wrong with me?" until one discovers that one is not alone, at which time guilt tends to dissipate as one is absorbed into a like-minded community.
In the second, one may have never heard of such a wild and unique turn-on until one acquires a life partner who is into WAM, and therefore, one not only learns what WAM is but learns to WAM.
But in the end, if all concerned have fun, it's not that big of a distinction, really.
To be a WAMmer, all that is actually required is that one must WAM and enjoy WAM for its own sake, whether that enjoyment is erotic or innocent.
To know if anyone, male or female, is a WAMmer, one must witness them in the act of WAMming.
Until then, one can only imagine..."Is she or isn't she?"
Nessie
What is a WAMmer?
Personally, I draw a distinction between having an innate WAM fetish and learning to WAM by virtue of having a life partner who WAMs.
In the first case, one has a mysterious attraction to WAMming activity dating from early childhood, which is often baffling to oneself, causing random disturbing guilty thoughts along the lines of "I just get VERY turned on by this...it makes me HOT so WHAT is wrong with me?" until one discovers that one is not alone, at which time guilt tends to dissipate as one is absorbed into a like-minded community.
In the second, one may have never heard of such a wild and unique turn-on until one acquires a life partner who is into WAM, and therefore, one not only learns what WAM is but learns to WAM.
But in the end, if all concerned have fun, it's not that big of a distinction, really.
To be a WAMmer, all that is actually required is that one must WAM and enjoy WAM for its own sake, whether that enjoyment is erotic or innocent.
To know if anyone, male or female, is a WAMmer, one must witness them in the act of WAMming.
Until then, one can only imagine..."Is she or isn't she?"
Nessie
elephant_on_fire said: Chances are somebody will figure out who she is and you'll regret posting this.
Unless Canada is smaller than I remember it being, I doubt it. There's lots of news anchors in Canada.
I dunno, man. Never underestimate the digging power of a motivated, gossip-loving journalist - especially when there's an opportunity to kick the ladder out from under another competitor.
What is a wammer? Someone who either (a) participates in wam or (b) views wam material.
Marlicious has had her fun experiences with jello wrestling and sliding on soapy surfaces, and even stepping into nice mud, all in the name of fun. When we met, the fun took on a different angle, and wam became a sexy thing for her.
So I think it is possible for someone to have the tendency to enjoy wam, but never connected the dots completely.
There are also partners who are willing to wam, but have no real desire of their own to instigate anything. I don't consider these people wammers, though they do participate in it.
To me a wammer is someone who will instigate some form of wam action, either watching wam, or participating in it.
I have not had my own photo on my profile for several years as I was once recognized on the UMD by a local business person who had done a search for my email address. It's surprising what you can find in Google!
Marlicious has had her fun experiences with jello wrestling and sliding on soapy surfaces, and even stepping into nice mud, all in the name of fun. When we met, the fun took on a different angle, and wam became a sexy thing for her.
So I think it is possible for someone to have the tendency to enjoy wam, but never connected the dots completely.
There are also partners who are willing to wam, but have no real desire of their own to instigate anything. I don't consider these people wammers, though they do participate in it.
To me a wammer is someone who will instigate some form of wam action, either watching wam, or participating in it.
I have not had my own photo on my profile for several years as I was once recognized on the UMD by a local business person who had done a search for my email address. It's surprising what you can find in Google!
Um - you could always ask her?
It is possible to move from being someone who WAMs largely for their partner's pleasure to someone who also WAMs for their own pleasure - I believe PiegirlKay is an example of this - and I guess it it what all of us who introduce our partner to WAM ultimately hope for. It is though, as your story shows, possible for you both to have plenty of fun, even if it turns out it's not something that turns her on personally.
P.S: Unless you've thrown in a couple of deliberate red herrings, I do think the amount of detail in your post would give a determined digger at least half a chance of working out who your wife probably is. It really is so important to be careful with this sort of thing online, there are plenty of idiots about with too much time on their hands.
It is possible to move from being someone who WAMs largely for their partner's pleasure to someone who also WAMs for their own pleasure - I believe PiegirlKay is an example of this - and I guess it it what all of us who introduce our partner to WAM ultimately hope for. It is though, as your story shows, possible for you both to have plenty of fun, even if it turns out it's not something that turns her on personally.
P.S: Unless you've thrown in a couple of deliberate red herrings, I do think the amount of detail in your post would give a determined digger at least half a chance of working out who your wife probably is. It really is so important to be careful with this sort of thing online, there are plenty of idiots about with too much time on their hands.
I don't think the OP has anything to worry about as far as identity or whatnot.
However, I do see a little correlation between reporters (broadcast and print) who are sometimes more "curious" about this interest than anyone would think.
Myself and Greg, who works for the PR department for the small prod comp that I work for was pitching a production we worked on about slow left lane drivers to a small time weekly newspaper in a suburb of a major US City. (good luck digging that
Anyhow, the print reporter who was doing some freelance stuff for the local affiliate and presumably will end up being hired by said affiliate, was asking Greg about some of the wackiest stuff he had to pitch as a PR professional of various prod companies. He mentioned a certain gameshow where people get slopped in public
and she had mentioned that she always volunteered to be in a dunk tank or receive pies for various charitable functions during her university years. "It is soooo much fun and I love it and would do it in an instant if anything like that came up in the future," was a quote that came from her mouth.
There have been other stories along those same lines that I can relay in my years of talking to these reporter types but I applaud the OP for posting this as her husband and an "insider" so to speak.
However, I do see a little correlation between reporters (broadcast and print) who are sometimes more "curious" about this interest than anyone would think.
Myself and Greg, who works for the PR department for the small prod comp that I work for was pitching a production we worked on about slow left lane drivers to a small time weekly newspaper in a suburb of a major US City. (good luck digging that
Anyhow, the print reporter who was doing some freelance stuff for the local affiliate and presumably will end up being hired by said affiliate, was asking Greg about some of the wackiest stuff he had to pitch as a PR professional of various prod companies. He mentioned a certain gameshow where people get slopped in public
and she had mentioned that she always volunteered to be in a dunk tank or receive pies for various charitable functions during her university years. "It is soooo much fun and I love it and would do it in an instant if anything like that came up in the future," was a quote that came from her mouth. There have been other stories along those same lines that I can relay in my years of talking to these reporter types but I applaud the OP for posting this as her husband and an "insider" so to speak.
Public pie and slime video collection available at www.ThatsUnfairTV.com.
CSJ said: What is a wammer? Someone who either (a) participates in wam or (b) views wam material.
Oops, I keep forgetting about "watchers"...and that is because I have never been able to even remotely imagine being satisfied by just watching!
The post is about a woman, though...and I have never even heard of a watcher female.
So, any lady out there who is satisfied by only watching WAM material?
I watch mostly in the winter when I can have nothing else. My WAM substance literally freezes under me for about three months, and I can accept no other.
Nessie
Nessie, we brought our mud 'To Go' last time we visited the now underwater Clay Pond. I sifted through it for sticks, bugs, etc. but found nothing but pure clay-based mud! It's now in a large plastic trash can and we keep an eye on it for moisture content, etc. until such time as we can shoot an indoor mud video with it.
So our winter won't have to be mudless now!
Also here's a bit of a horror story. (True)
I had made the foolish mistake of posting maps of our play areas on here - Google Earth maps with no names of places, etc. visible. However, a clever reader of the forum here was able to match the images I posted with Google Earth and figured out where we were playing - most specifically the name of the creek that leads to our Clay Pond.
We had told nobody in our 'real' world of our location or activities, it's extremely secluded with only farmland surrounding it, and a thick layer of trees and bullrushes on the perimeter so that even the farmers would likely not see anything. (they'd have to bush-whack through tall bullrushes and there would be no reason for them to do so)
So with only the umd forum visitors aware of our location (through the map we posted) we were shocked to find the provincial police at our door at ten o'clock that evening. They said there was a report of 'porn-videos' being shot at _______creek. (The name of the waterway we were at) Absolutely nobody saw us, and absolutely nobody in our 'real world' knew we were going there. I immediately contacted MM who kindly removed my map images, but only after the damage was done, as far as someone on here figuring out our location and notifying the authorities. We had not broken any laws however, as we were in a public waterway (despite it being dried out to a pond of mud) so not trespassing, and we were not in a public place. (Legal definition is that at least one person must be able to see you, otherwise it's a private place, even if has public access) Also, Marlicious was only topless, which happens to be legal here in our province, rendering the 'porn' suggestion erroneous.
So the police only gave us a warning, yet it was quite disturbing to know that someone accessing the forum here went to all the bother to cause such trouble for us.
So lesson leaned - you can never be too careful with what you post on here or any other forum! Though most people are interested and supportive, there are always a few people who love to stir things up, that's just human nature!
So our winter won't have to be mudless now!
Also here's a bit of a horror story. (True)
I had made the foolish mistake of posting maps of our play areas on here - Google Earth maps with no names of places, etc. visible. However, a clever reader of the forum here was able to match the images I posted with Google Earth and figured out where we were playing - most specifically the name of the creek that leads to our Clay Pond.
We had told nobody in our 'real' world of our location or activities, it's extremely secluded with only farmland surrounding it, and a thick layer of trees and bullrushes on the perimeter so that even the farmers would likely not see anything. (they'd have to bush-whack through tall bullrushes and there would be no reason for them to do so)
So with only the umd forum visitors aware of our location (through the map we posted) we were shocked to find the provincial police at our door at ten o'clock that evening. They said there was a report of 'porn-videos' being shot at _______creek. (The name of the waterway we were at) Absolutely nobody saw us, and absolutely nobody in our 'real world' knew we were going there. I immediately contacted MM who kindly removed my map images, but only after the damage was done, as far as someone on here figuring out our location and notifying the authorities. We had not broken any laws however, as we were in a public waterway (despite it being dried out to a pond of mud) so not trespassing, and we were not in a public place. (Legal definition is that at least one person must be able to see you, otherwise it's a private place, even if has public access) Also, Marlicious was only topless, which happens to be legal here in our province, rendering the 'porn' suggestion erroneous.
So the police only gave us a warning, yet it was quite disturbing to know that someone accessing the forum here went to all the bother to cause such trouble for us.
So lesson leaned - you can never be too careful with what you post on here or any other forum! Though most people are interested and supportive, there are always a few people who love to stir things up, that's just human nature!
There clearly is at least one grade A nutjob out there who no doubt imagines himself to have no fetish while at the same time having fetishized the act of spreading misery wherever those who enjoy wet-and-messy fun can be found. In an ideal world, the "batshit insane" alarm would have gone off after an infallible voice analyzer determined the caller was severely disturbed, information would cross whatever borders it must, then burly men in white coats would take the malicious individual to an appropriate institution until such time as assorted therapies imbued him with a modicum of basic human decency.
Alas, our world is a fair distance from that ideal. People with such an affliction are able to hide from their own demented darkness by railing with as much hostility as possible against the imagined "danger" posed by comparatively sane adults engaged in enjoyable and consensual activities. It would have been nice to alert authorities about this particular villain after his false report, but I also understand why good people often would rather simply have as little to do with police investigations as possible. If he continues to engage in this sort of mischief, eventually someone with insight and a badge will do the right thing.
In any case, I have to express my admiration for the couple that is one half sploshing journalist. I have long thought an anchorwoman would make an ideal long term partner -- the good ones pair beauty with brains, they so often dress in a manner consistent with my preferences, plus I believe journalists are by nature both open-minded and adventurous. To find someone just right for that "dignified and poised to utterly sloppy" transformation is hard enough. To find someone someone like that who also holds up her end in conversation -- the possibilities fast approach perfection.
Regards,
messydom
Alas, our world is a fair distance from that ideal. People with such an affliction are able to hide from their own demented darkness by railing with as much hostility as possible against the imagined "danger" posed by comparatively sane adults engaged in enjoyable and consensual activities. It would have been nice to alert authorities about this particular villain after his false report, but I also understand why good people often would rather simply have as little to do with police investigations as possible. If he continues to engage in this sort of mischief, eventually someone with insight and a badge will do the right thing.
In any case, I have to express my admiration for the couple that is one half sploshing journalist. I have long thought an anchorwoman would make an ideal long term partner -- the good ones pair beauty with brains, they so often dress in a manner consistent with my preferences, plus I believe journalists are by nature both open-minded and adventurous. To find someone just right for that "dignified and poised to utterly sloppy" transformation is hard enough. To find someone someone like that who also holds up her end in conversation -- the possibilities fast approach perfection.
Regards,
messydom
Have you ever tried having sex with her?
First time poster, eh? Has someone else been posting under your username? Because if you click on forum posts under your name, there are quite a few other posts by you including one where you are with your wife for 5 and not 10 years. I am no detective though, just a lil confused and needing clarification. Carry on gents.
CSJ said: Nessie, we brought our mud 'To Go' last time we visited the now underwater Clay Pond. I sifted through it for sticks, bugs, etc. but found nothing but pure clay-based mud! It's now in a large plastic trash can and we keep an eye on it for moisture content, etc. until such time as we can shoot an indoor mud video with it.
So our winter won't have to be mudless now!
Also here's a bit of a horror story. (True)
I had made the foolish mistake of posting maps of our play areas on here - Google Earth maps with no names of places, etc. visible. However, a clever reader of the forum here was able to match the images I posted with Google Earth and figured out where we were playing - most specifically the name of the creek that leads to our Clay Pond.
We had told nobody in our 'real' world of our location or activities, it's extremely secluded with only farmland surrounding it, and a thick layer of trees and bullrushes on the perimeter so that even the farmers would likely not see anything. (they'd have to bush-whack through tall bullrushes and there would be no reason for them to do so)
So with only the umd forum visitors aware of our location (through the map we posted) we were shocked to find the provincial police at our door at ten o'clock that evening. They said there was a report of 'porn-videos' being shot at _______creek. (The name of the waterway we were at) Absolutely nobody saw us, and absolutely nobody in our 'real world' knew we were going there. I immediately contacted MM who kindly removed my map images, but only after the damage was done, as far as someone on here figuring out our location and notifying the authorities. We had not broken any laws however, as we were in a public waterway (despite it being dried out to a pond of mud) so not trespassing, and we were not in a public place. (Legal definition is that at least one person must be able to see you, otherwise it's a private place, even if has public access) Also, Marlicious was only topless, which happens to be legal here in our province, rendering the 'porn' suggestion erroneous.
So the police only gave us a warning, yet it was quite disturbing to know that someone accessing the forum here went to all the bother to cause such trouble for us.
So lesson leaned - you can never be too careful with what you post on here or any other forum! Though most people are interested and supportive, there are always a few people who love to stir things up, that's just human nature!
So our winter won't have to be mudless now!
Also here's a bit of a horror story. (True)
I had made the foolish mistake of posting maps of our play areas on here - Google Earth maps with no names of places, etc. visible. However, a clever reader of the forum here was able to match the images I posted with Google Earth and figured out where we were playing - most specifically the name of the creek that leads to our Clay Pond.
We had told nobody in our 'real' world of our location or activities, it's extremely secluded with only farmland surrounding it, and a thick layer of trees and bullrushes on the perimeter so that even the farmers would likely not see anything. (they'd have to bush-whack through tall bullrushes and there would be no reason for them to do so)
So with only the umd forum visitors aware of our location (through the map we posted) we were shocked to find the provincial police at our door at ten o'clock that evening. They said there was a report of 'porn-videos' being shot at _______creek. (The name of the waterway we were at) Absolutely nobody saw us, and absolutely nobody in our 'real world' knew we were going there. I immediately contacted MM who kindly removed my map images, but only after the damage was done, as far as someone on here figuring out our location and notifying the authorities. We had not broken any laws however, as we were in a public waterway (despite it being dried out to a pond of mud) so not trespassing, and we were not in a public place. (Legal definition is that at least one person must be able to see you, otherwise it's a private place, even if has public access) Also, Marlicious was only topless, which happens to be legal here in our province, rendering the 'porn' suggestion erroneous.
So the police only gave us a warning, yet it was quite disturbing to know that someone accessing the forum here went to all the bother to cause such trouble for us.
So lesson leaned - you can never be too careful with what you post on here or any other forum! Though most people are interested and supportive, there are always a few people who love to stir things up, that's just human nature!
Excuse me for being a bit naive, or some might say thick, but this person must have followed you home. Or how else would the 'old bill' know where you lived?
Now that is more creepy that watching you play in mud!
I want to get muddy
Yea I dont mean to call BS but this is not your first post or your first thread for that matter.
In a past post you said
That was 2009. So if 5 years was your total for dating and married. Then in your last post you say this? odddddddddd man.
and your entire post conflicts with this post you made about asking if shes a wammer... i think you would know the answer judging by that post.
I dont mean to be a troll but your fishy dude.
In a past post you said
I am into seeing a woman fully dressed getting wet, basically a wetlook fetish. I've been with my wife for 5 years (dating and married) and for the most part she's induldged my my fetish..
That was 2009. So if 5 years was your total for dating and married. Then in your last post you say this? odddddddddd man.
In the 10 years we have been together, I have probably pied her 100 times.
and your entire post conflicts with this post you made about asking if shes a wammer... i think you would know the answer judging by that post.
My wife is very similar in that she tollerated my wam fetish when we first started dating and got married, but now she has grown to despise it. However, when she wants something really bad, she'll bribe into getting her way by letting me throw shaving cream pies at her. If it weren't for her trying to bribe me, I probably would have thrown my last shaving cream pie al long time ago. She is much more tollerant of my wetlook fetish and gets wet fully clothed often enough.
I dont mean to be a troll but your fishy dude.
CSJ said: Nessie, we brought our mud 'To Go' last time we visited the now underwater Clay Pond. I sifted through it for sticks, bugs, etc. but found nothing but pure clay-based mud! It's now in a large plastic trash can and we keep an eye on it for moisture content, etc. until such time as we can shoot an indoor mud video with it.
Awesome!
I'd keep an eye on it to make sure it stays good, but if it's truly clay -- it should be good indefinitely!
it was quite disturbing to know that someone accessing the forum here went to all the bother to cause such trouble for us.
I've had a lot of people ask me where my peat pits are.
No way do I post that stuff. If somebody wants to see those, they got to get to know ME. On some of my more recent clips, you see the words "Poison Sumac Bog" or "Windy Lake". Um, no, that's not what they're named on the map. I figure, I have an online "handle"...so my mudpits can have aliases too.
Nessie
I just had a flashback to a pretty reporter who last fall, during a bit of a heatwave, did an article and when finished, her cameraman zoomed out with the lense to show she was standing waist deep, fully clothed in Toronto harbour for the piece she shot... she made a dash for shore from the chilly water as the article concluded
gopher1 said: I just had a flashback to a pretty reporter who last fall, during a bit of a heatwave, did an article and when finished, her cameraman zoomed out with the lense to show she was standing waist deep, fully clothed in Toronto harbour for the piece she shot... she made a dash for shore from the chilly water as the article concluded
That sounds like a great, surprising, "reveal", as the cameraman panned back! I sure wish I could have seen that! Keep an eye on her. She may be up for some more "odd segments" that might put her in the way of wet or mess.
Norman
pie_chap said: Um - you could always ask her?
It is possible to move from being someone who WAMs largely for their partner's pleasure to someone who also WAMs for their own pleasure - I believe PiegirlKay is an example of this - and I guess it it what all of us who introduce our partner to WAM ultimately hope for. It is though, as your story shows, possible for you both to have plenty of fun, even if it turns out it's not something that turns her on personally.
P.S: Unless you've thrown in a couple of deliberate red herrings, I do think the amount of detail in your post would give a determined digger at least half a chance of working out who your wife probably is. It really is so important to be careful with this sort of thing online, there are plenty of idiots about with too much time on their hands.
It is possible to move from being someone who WAMs largely for their partner's pleasure to someone who also WAMs for their own pleasure - I believe PiegirlKay is an example of this - and I guess it it what all of us who introduce our partner to WAM ultimately hope for. It is though, as your story shows, possible for you both to have plenty of fun, even if it turns out it's not something that turns her on personally.
P.S: Unless you've thrown in a couple of deliberate red herrings, I do think the amount of detail in your post would give a determined digger at least half a chance of working out who your wife probably is. It really is so important to be careful with this sort of thing online, there are plenty of idiots about with too much time on their hands.
You are correct pie_chap with regards to piegirlkay initially indulging my fantasies and eventually getting to the point where she is driven more by it then me...of which I am eternally grateful!
SCGuy
I have inside jokes with complete strangers
|
Upcoming Events:
Scene Highlights:
Scene Highlights:
 |  |
